Glossary
DPI
Distributions to Paid-In Capital—actual cash returned to investors versus money invested.
By Amit Tyagi, Fitoor Capital · AletheiaAI Glossary
Definition
DPI (Distributions to Paid-In Capital) measures the ratio of cash actually distributed to Limited Partners against the capital they deployed into a fund. A DPI of 1.5x means investors received ₹1.50 for every ₹1 invested. Unlike TVPI, which includes unrealized gains, DPI reflects only realized returns—money in the bank.
DPI is calculated as: Total Distributions ÷ Paid-In Capital. A fund with ₹100 crore raised and ₹150 crore distributed has a DPI of 1.5x. This metric matters because it answers a simple question: did the fund actually return cash, or are gains still locked in portfolio companies?
Seasoned LP networks in India track DPI religiously during fund evaluation. A DPI above 1.0x signals the fund has returned capital and begun generating true profit. Below 1.0x, the fund is still deploying or sitting on unrealized gains. Most institutional LPs target 1.2x+ DPI before committing to follow-on funds from the same manager.
India Context
Indian PE/VC funds report DPI alongside TVPI under SEBI Alternative Investment Fund guidelines. SEBI's 2012 framework requires AIFs to disclose distributions quarterly to LPs. However, many mid-market Indian funds still lack consistent exit velocity—exit timelines stretch 7–10 years versus global 4–5 year benchmarks. This extends DPI realization cycles.
Regulatory nuance: Indian fund managers often hold stakes in portfolio companies post-growth stage, delaying full distributions. Founder exits via secondary sales or IPOs (like Zomato, Nykaa) generate sudden DPI jumps. Tax considerations under Schedule VI of Income Tax Act also influence distribution timing—some funds stagger exits to optimize LP tax brackets.
Benchmarking: India-focused VC funds typically see DPI of 0.8–1.2x after 5 years; PE funds targeting 0.6–0.9x (longer hold periods). A 1.5x+ DPI within 7 years is considered strong for Indian mid-market funds.
Example
Accel Partners India Fund III (₹200 crore raised in 2012) returned approximately ₹280 crore in distributions by 2018 via exits like Flipkart, Freshworks, and secondary sales—a DPI of 1.4x. This demonstrated concrete exit velocity and justified their Fund IV fundraise.
Contrast: A mid-tier Indian VC fund with ₹50 crore AUM and only ₹20 crore in distributions after 6 years shows DPI of 0.4x. LPs worry whether remaining portfolio holdings will deliver or dilute further. This fund struggles raising follow-on capital until exits accelerate.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Terms
Apply what you've learned
See this term at work on real Indian companies.
AletheiaAI checks market narratives against the filings behind them — screener, company disclosures, and sector reports across India’s listed companies, free.